When it comes to David Yates, a former resident of my hometown of St Helens, I am only familiar with his TV work. I cannot imagine anything worse than sitting through something from the pen of JK Rowling so I've avoided all of his previous cinematic efforts, until now. Because who doesn't like a bit of Tarzan right?
As befits a story that is now 107 years old and has been told on film well over 50 times, Yates' The Legend of Tarzan is good old fashioned fun starring Alexander Skarsgård as Tarzan and Margot Robbie as Jane. It's not perfect by any means, but it's thankfully never really boring. It's just a good little watch. My main issue with it is its over reliance on CGI but then, given that that's the way of all films nowadays, you can't really point the finger of blame at this alone.
The Legend of Tarzan is a film that wants to appeal to all possible admirers of Borroughs' literary creation. There's the traditionalist, historically accurate side here that is reminiscent of Hugh Hudson's 1984 epic Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes, rolling the story back to the late 1800s in order to engage with the colonial evils of King Leopold of Belgium, and then there's the popcorn blockbuster elements that play to those who perhaps prefer their Tarzan to be a bit more Johnny Weissmuller. In the main The Legend of Tarzan straddles these camps rather well, by weaving Tarzan's origin story through the adventure. The storyline of Jane's kidnapping is classic Borroughs, whilst the inclusion of genuine historical figures like George Washington Williams (played by Samuel L. Jackson, on likable form) and Léon Rom (played by Christoph Waltz, as the film's main antagonist) lends the film some authenticity and gravitas.
Incorporating Williams in the story helps to negate the 'white saviour' stereotype that often dogs these stories but equally, the decision to give the hero a black sidekick is also fraught with problems and somewhat poorly serves the memory of a great man. In reality, George Washington Williams was a fascinating figure who, at one time or another, was a soldier, a baptist minister, a historian, a lawyer and an activist. Born a free man in Bedford Springs, Pennsylvania in 1849, he enlisted with the Union Army to fight during the American Civil War when he was just fourteen. When the war ended, he joined General Espinosa's Republican Army in Mexico in the fight to overthrow Emperor Maximilian, rising to the rank of lieutenant. Upon his return to America in 1867, he enlisted in the 10th Infantry and saw action in the Indian territory. Receiving an honourable discharge after being invalided out a year later, Williams began studying at Boston's Newton Theological Institution, becoming the first first African American to graduate from there in 1874. After concluding his studies, Williams was ordained a Baptist minister but went on to study law in Ohio under Alfonso Taft, father of President Taft. The first African American to be elected to the Ohio state legislature, Williams served a term there before becoming a delegate to the World's Conference of Foreign Missions at London in 1888. The subsequent year he was granted an audience with King Leopold of Belgium and, with support from US President Benjamin Harrison, was invited to travel the Belgium-owned Congo Free State. Appalled by what he saw there, Williams penned an open letter in 1890 condemning Leopold and the Belgian authorities for their harsh treatment of the native Congolese workforce. A year later, Williams died in Blackpool, England from tuberculosis and pleurisy. In 1975, a tombstone was placed at his grave by an American historian and local supporters, commemorating Williams as an 'Afro-American historian'. It still stands there to this day.
George Washington Williams' grave in Blackpool
Unfortunately, none of this fascinating, varied and principled life ever really comes to light in The Legend of Tarzan. Sure, there's a moment about halfway in where, over a bit of male-bonding around the campfire, Samuel L. Jackson is forced to vocalise a painfully obvious Wiki info dump to acknowledge his character's backstory, but that's about it. Instead, screenwriters Craig Brewer and Adam Cozad choose to build the entire character of Williams around an in-depth knowledge of firearms - which means that every single time he comes across a gun of any kind, Jackson has to appreciatively murmur just what that gun actually is, and that gets very tedious, very quickly.
Léon Rom was a prominent member of the Congo Free State's administration in the late 19th century. Said to be the inspiration for Joseph Conrad's Kurtz in his 1899 novella, Heart of Darkness (later loosely adapted by Francis Ford Coppola for Apocalypse Now), Rom was born into poverty in Belgium in 1859. Like Williams, he became a soldier at an early age, enlisting with the Belgian Army at sixteen. After leaving service he began work in a customs office, leaving for the Congo in 1886 to work in the State's administration. Ambitious and talented, Rom secured several rapid promotions to become district commissioner of Matadi, before transferring to the Force Publique with the rank of captain. There, he saw action in the Congo Arab War of 1892-'94 and was personally praised for his negotiation of the surrender of the Arab stronghold. Leaving the colonial military, Rom served as an official for the Compagnie du Kasai in central Congo and became notorious for his brutal methods, including using severed heads of 21 Congolose to decorate the flower beds of his Stanley Falls residence and keeping a gallows permanently in place there. He died in 1924, still in office.
The real Rom
It's hardly a stretch for Waltz, but he makes a perfect, skin-crawling villain here as he holds Jane hostage in an attempt to lure Tarzan to his doom at the hands of Djimon Hounsou's vengeful tribal leader, Chief Mbonga. You could argue that, just like Williams, the real person here is barely glimpsed. In Rom's case I imagine that this is because his horrific and violent colonial attitudes would not be tenable for a 12A rated film. Nevertheless even watered down, he's still a very hissable and effective villain and, if I have one complaint, it's that the 12A rating ensures that we are robbed the real satisfaction of his ultimate demise. After 100 minutes of his oleaginous evil, the audience needed to see him receive his just desserts in graphic fashion. I appreciate why this of course is a 12A; Tarzan appeals to children and adults but probably does very little for teens and twentysomethings, but I long for the days of Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Ark and the like when things could be just that little bit more graphic for kids.
I mentioned Hounsou there and he is essentially the secondary villain, albeit one with an ultimately sympathetic motivation. Unfortunately the screenplay fails to capitalise upon this, ensuring that his climactic confrontation with Tarzan feels like our hero has just reached a boss level on a sandbox game that this CGI-heavy spectacle sometimes resembles. Thankfully Hounsou is a skillful actor who invests great tragedy and nobility in his all-to-brief scenes, but this character and his impact on the narrative would have been much better served by some more screen time and by flagging his motivation up a good deal earlier in the story. If they had done that, then they would have also allowed some extra dimensions to the character of Tarzan too. A real shame and a missed opportunity.
Brewer and Cozad's screenplay also fails to deliver the sense of threat in the alleged 20,000-strong Belgian militia who remain unseen and moored offshore in a flotilla of obvious CGI ships, whilst some of the dialogue is clunky and too modern. I was also left to wonder just why it is that almost every Belgian speaks with a noticeable English accent, barring Waltz of course, who speaks with his Austrian accent. It struck me straight away with an all too briefly seen Ben Chaplin ("cup of tea, Mart") in the film's opening sequence, but it continues with Simon Russell Beale too. A lot of quality British thespians are glimpsed here, but I get the sense that a lot of their actual work ended up on the cutting room floor. For example, Miles Jupp can just about be identified in one scene set at Greystoke, whilst Genevieve O'Reilly gasps a little in flashback as Tarzan's mother, Lady Agatha, before carking it. Jim Broadbent also delivers a panto-aristo cameo as Gladstone that's effectively blink and you'll miss it.
As for my fellow St Helener Yates, I'm surprised that he's renowned for helming big budget family entertainment because his handling of action sequences isn't the best at all. The CGI is problematic of course, but surely a better hand on the tiller could cover up some of this? Equally I never felt convinced by the rendering of the animals here, to that end, this film is not on a par with the likes of the recent Planet of the Apes movies. Where was Andy Serkis when you needed him? Or maybe just a bigger budget and better CGI artists?















































